WHO IT IS FOR
Three conditions
An AI use already running
The tool is in production in a real workflow, not in a pilot and not on a slide. People have already adapted around it.
A decision coming up
You have to extend it to another team, renew a commitment, fix something that is not working, replace it or stop it.
Something you can share
An export, a shared calendar, a version history, a folder of dated files. We ask for exports rather than access.
If the workflow was deployed last month, or if no decision is expected for a year, the analysis would produce a document rather than a decision. We will tell you so.
THE REPORT
Seven parts
Decision note
The decision you are preparing, the scope we agreed, the findings that change it, the open questions, and which of the three outcomes the survey reaches.
Scope and sources
Which workflow was examined, which elements you provided, and what we could not examine. This is also where the method's own limit is stated: the single source is you, so what you cannot see is not in this report.
Declared map
Input, tools, people, decisions, hand-offs, validations, exceptions, output, as you describe them. One page, readable by everyone involved.
Intervention register
Each point where a person steps in: when, who, what they do, how often, what authority they hold, and what happens if it goes wrong. All of it as reported by you — an account of other people's work is a statement, not a measurement, and the register says so at the top.
Findings
Each one says what it rests on. Confirmed by the available elements, declared without an independent trace, a gap between the two, or an open question. Subscriptions and direct costs sit here too, when an invoice or an export establishes them.
What must be decided
Each line names an open question and the person who has the authority to settle it — observed in part 04, never assigned by us. Where no such person can be observed, that absence is the finding. A deadline appears only when a dated fact of yours carries it: a renewal, an announced decision, an engaged project. We do not set deadlines.
Your observations
What you dispute, correct or add after reading, recorded as you put it. Where we retain a correction, the finding changes and the change is dated. Where we do not, the disagreement stays written and we do not arbitrate it.
Plus a short appendix: sources, method, version. Parts are as long as what could be established, and no longer — a thin part is left thin. A regulatory annotation is added on top only when it is relevant to your situation.
This term is defined in the lexicon, with the standing of its source — Reconstruction. Read the definition
HOW IT RUNS
Five to ten business days
Before we start
The call opens on a sort: you name the workflows where AI plays a part, each one gets three questions — does it touch a client or money, is a decision coming on it, what happens if its output is wrong and nobody sees it — and you designate the one we examine. We do not pick for you: all we have of the others is your description. The report says which one was retained and what settled it, and in the same breath that the sort covers what you named from memory, without elements to hand. Nothing begins before the scope is written down and confirmed by you.
What we ask of you
Around two to three hours in total, and they are yours: the scoping call, a second conversation once we have read your elements, and the readout. We do not interview your teams at this stage — the Full Map does, and that is what it adds.
What we do
We start from the procedure and from what people describe, then look for elements that would confirm it. Where the two disagree, we look for a second source of a different kind.
How it ends
The written report, then a sixty-minute readout where we go through it with whoever needs to be in the room.
The readout: sixty minutes going through the report together, finding by finding, with what supports each one.
PRICE
Entry scope · one-time · excl. VAT 21% · readout included
This covers one workflow agreed with you, the interviews, the reading and cross-checking of what you provide, the written report and the readout. Additional workflows are quoted separately, because the effort grows with each one rather than being spread across them.
LIMITS
What this is not
- Not an audit. Nothing is checked against a standard and no judgement is issued.
- Not a certification. No result is opposable to a third party as proof of anything.
- Not legal advice. Where a regulatory reading is relevant, it is added as an annotation and does not replace qualified counsel.
- Not a guarantee of savings. The extra work a deployment created may well be justified by what it produces. We make it visible so the decision is made with it.
- Not exhaustive beyond the scope. Other workflows in the same organisation may run very differently.
AFTERWARDS
What can follow
Another workflow
Quoted separately, and usually faster once a first picture exists in the organisation.
Periodic re-analysis
The same scope re-examined, telling you what moved and what no longer holds.
The regulatory layer
Where it applies to you, the analysis serves as the starting point for governance and compliance work, on our side or with your own advisers.
Start with the scope
Tell us which decision is coming and which workflow carries it. If there is no fit, we will say so before you pay.
Check the fit