SPRINKLING ACT
SPRINKLING ACT — TRANSPARENCY
Here is what the Sprinkling Act Full Report actually does for your company — and what it cannot do. Both matter.
WHAT YOU GAIN — IN ORDER
Security
Most companies deploying AI in Europe don't know they're in scope. The AI Act applies regardless of where you're established — if your system produces outputs used in the EU, you're affected. The Full Report tells you exactly where you stand, based on the legal text, not an opinion.
The alternative is discovering your position during an audit.
Protection
The Sprinkling Act report is built to be defensible. Every conclusion cites a specific article. Every gate is documented. The decision path is traceable. If a national supervisory authority asks about your AI system's classification, you have a versioned, dated, methodologically grounded response — not a slide deck.
A lawyer's opinion costs more and cites the same articles.
Credibility
Clients ask. Investors ask. Partners ask. 'Are you AI Act compliant?' is becoming a procurement question. The Sprinkling Act badge — verifiable, dated, linked to your report — is a concrete answer. Not a claim. A document with a number, a score, and a methodology behind it.
The badge is yours. What you do with it is your decision.
Advantage
Most of your competitors are in one of three positions: unaware, in denial, or waiting for the law to ‘settle.’ Art. 5 prohibitions and GPAI obligations are already enforceable. Art. 50 transparency follows August 2, 2026. High-risk Annex III obligations apply from December 2, 2027. Companies that have already assessed their position will spend that period implementing. Companies that haven’t will spend it reacting.
We don’t know your competitors. We know the timeline.
Clarity
The intake questionnaire forces a level of precision about your AI system that most teams have never attempted. What data does it process? Who does it affect? What decisions does it influence? Companies that go through the full assessment often discover architectural and governance gaps that had nothing to do with compliance.
The report is the output. The process is the value.
Truth
Any vendor can say ‘EU AI Act-ready.’ A Sprinkling Act report says it with a date, a methodology version, a gate-by-gate classification, and an assessor on record. When your procurement team, your investors, or a supervisory authority asks — you don’t claim. You prove.
Claims are free. Proofs are €690.
Sprinkling Act FULL REPORT
15-20 pages. Article by article. Yours permanently.
WHAT WE CANNOT DO
Saying this clearly is part of the product. A service that overpromises is a liability, not an asset.
The Sprinkling Act report is an independent assessment based on the text of EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689. It is not a substitute for qualified legal counsel. If you are subject to enforcement action, consult a lawyer.
Sprinkling Act is our proprietary scoring standard. It reflects our interpretation of EU AI Act Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as of March 2026. Future delegated acts, AI Board guidelines, or jurisprudence may require reassessment. Other qualified assessors may reach different conclusions.
Your Sprinkling Act score reflects your system at the time of assessment. If your system changes, or if new regulatory guidance is published, your classification may change. The report includes a temporal stability indicator for this reason.
No one does. The AI Act has not yet produced enforcement decisions. We score based on the legal text. We do not predict enforcement priorities, fine amounts, or supervisory authority behaviour.
ISO 42001 is a voluntary management standard. EU AI Act 2024/1689 is a legal obligation. They address different questions. ISO 42001 certification does not establish your classification position under the AI Act. A Sprinkling Act report does — and the two are complementary, not substitutes.
WHO IS BEHIND THIS
Sprinkling Act is an independent professional project operated by Lamar B. Shucrani, registered in Belgium (BCE: BE 1034.962.482). No VC funding. No advisory board of lobbyists. No conflict of interest with AI vendors or regulators.
The client-funded model is not a marketing claim — it is how the economics work. The score cannot be influenced by anyone other than the legal text of the AI Act.
The Sprinkling Act methodology is public, versioned, and documented at /methodology. Anyone can read it, challenge it, or cite it.
The 4 ACTS framework — our companion lens for AI agent builders — is published as an open MIT repository at github.com/sprinkling-act. The system prompts are free to fork. The regulatory expertise that produces an actual assessment is not.