About
Independent AI Risk Infrastructure. Built for the AI Act era.
Sprinkling Act was founded on a simple observation: the EU AI Act creates a new class of regulatory obligation that most companies do not yet understand — and that existing AI Act screening tools are too slow, too expensive, and too opaque to address at scale.
We built a scoring engine that maps directly to the legal text — article by article, gate by gate — and produces a single, defensible output: a star-based classification, a score, and a full audit trail. No ambiguity. No interpretation. No conflict of interest.
Every assessment generates a structured artefact — a traceable, versioned, article-mapped document that can be independently verified. This is not a recommendation. It is a proof.
WHO BUILDS THIS
Built by someone who builds and audits AI systems.
Sprinkling Act is founded and operated by Lamar B. Shucrani — an AI systems integrator, AI evaluation auditor, and prompt architect based in Brussels, Belgium (Avenue des Arts 19 BT 2, 1210).
This dual expertise — building AI systems and auditing them — is the foundation of the Sprinkling Act methodology. The scoring engine was designed by someone who understands both how AI systems are constructed and how they should be evaluated against regulatory text.
The goal is not to sell compliance. It is to produce an artefact: a structured, traceable declaration of regulatory position that any qualified third party can analyse independently.
AI Systems Integrator
Designs, builds, and deploys AI systems in production environments. Understands the architecture that regulators evaluate.
AI Evaluation Auditor
Assesses AI systems against regulatory frameworks. Maps technical implementations to legal obligations, article by article.
Prompt Architect
Structures the interaction layer between humans and AI systems. Ensures outputs are traceable, reproducible, and auditable.
Every Sprinkling Act assessment produces an artefact — not an opinion. A structured output, grounded in the legal text, that can be traced, dated, and independently analysed.
Note: Sprinkling Act operates independently from any prior AI systems work. No current or prospective client has been a prior advisory or integration client. This separation ensures scoring integrity.
OPERATING PRINCIPLES
Conflict-free
Client-funded model. No advertiser, no regulator, no AI vendor can influence the score. No financial relationship with any AI vendor, regulator, or certification body. A “minimal risk” result is not a failed sale — it is a documented clean position. The value is in being assessed, not in having problems found.
Legally Grounded
Every gate cites a specific article. Art. 5, 6, 50, 51 — no black box, no interpretation layer between the law and the output.
Transparent
Full audit trail on every score. You see exactly which gates triggered, which articles applied, and why.
Artefact-Based
The output is a structured document — versioned, dated, traceable. It can be verified by any qualified third party without our involvement.
HOW WE STAY CURRENT
Regulatory intelligence, not opinion.
We monitor regulatory sources across EU institutions, national authorities, and industry publications daily in 15 languages.
Every regulatory signal is scored on 6 dimensions before influencing any assessment.
Sources are never removed. Every update is versioned.
When a signal reaches CRITICAL tier, affected reports are flagged automatically.
WHY THIS IS DIFFERENT
Law firm
Expert opinion
Automated system + early detection
Compliance consultant
Checklist + audit
Real-time infrastructure
Generic SaaS tool
Static questionnaire
Versioned methodology + living signal
Regulatory blog
Information
Date-stamped proof of advance + recommended action
LEGAL ENTITY
Sprinkling Act is an independent professional project operated by Lamar B. Shucrani, registered in Belgium.
BCE: BE 1034.962.482
Location: Avenue des Arts 19 BT 2, 1210 Brussels, Belgium
Founded: 2026
Funding: Self-funded. No venture capital. No advisory board.
Conflicts: None. No relationship with AI vendors, regulators, or certification bodies.
OUR OWN AI ACT POSITION
We apply what we sell.
Sprinkling Act uses a deterministic, rule-based scoring engine — not a machine learning model. It does not learn from data, does not adapt after deployment, and does not generate inferences beyond the explicit rules coded from the regulatory text.
Based on current Art. 3(1) guidance of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, we assess our engine as not meeting the definition of an AI system. It is a structured compliance calculator that maps questionnaire inputs to legal articles through deterministic logic. This assessment is not binding on regulatory authorities.
Even if classified as AI, the system would qualify for the Art. 6(3)(a) exception: it performs a narrow, well-defined procedural task with no autonomous decision-making, no profiling of natural persons, and no significant impact on individuals.
Classification: Not an AI system — Minimal Risk by analogy
Human-Controlled Analysis
Full reports are subject to human review and validation before delivery. The scoring engine produces a structured first pass — the final output is human-controlled.
Beyond Compliance: AI Positive
We don’t just meet the legal floor — we aim for the ethical ceiling. Our AI Positive framework measures performance across 5 criteria that go beyond what the AI Act requires: governance, fairness, explainability, human impact, and reversibility.
Learn about AI PositiveLegal Disclaimer
Sprinkling Act is an independent assessment service. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the European Commission, the European Parliament, or any national supervisory authority. Assessment results are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. Companies should consult qualified legal counsel for compliance decisions.