01
We are not a law firm or a Big 4 practice.
You don’t pay €300/hour (Big 4 audit firms : PwC, Deloitte, EY, KPMG, or top-tier law practices such as Bird & Bird, DLA Piper, Hogan Lovells). You pay €3,900 once for an artifact you can show your lawyer, your board, your investors.
02
We are not an automated AI Act compliance platform.
You don’t subscribe to a tool you’ll forget after month one (automated AI governance SaaS platforms such as Credo AI, Holistic AI, Modulos, Saidot, or Trail). You receive a document that exists and proves something, regardless of whether this platform is still online in 2 years.
03
We do not produce legal opinions.
What you receive is not an interpretation. When you need legal counsel, you arrive with a structured artifact, not a blank page.
04
We do not promise compliance.
Compliance is your responsibility. Our role is to give you a defensible starting point, not to sell you a certification we don’t have the power to deliver.
05
We are not your insurance.
If the information you provide is accurate, the report is. If it isn’t, the report reflects what you told us, not the reality of your system. Our independence is not a policy. It’s a condition of operation. We can only produce a defensible artifact if no one, including you, can influence the result.
WHO IS BEHIND THIS
Sprinkling Act is an independent professional project operated by Lamar B. Shucrani, registered in Belgium (BCE: BE 1034.962.482). No VC funding. No advisory board of lobbyists. No conflict of interest with AI vendors or regulators.
The client-funded model is not a marketing claim. It is how the economics work.
The Sprinkling Act methodology is public, versioned, and documented at /methodology. Anyone can read it, challenge it, or cite it.
All published Sprinkling Act reports are cryptographically timestamped via OpenTimestamps. Public proofs are at github.com/sprinkling-act/timestamps. Independently verifiable on the Bitcoin blockchain, regardless of Sprinkling Act.