01
We are not a law firm or a Big 4 practice.
You don’t pay €300/hour for a classification (Big 4 audit firms — PwC, Deloitte, EY, KPMG — or top-tier law practices such as Bird & Bird, DLA Piper, Hogan Lovells). You pay €690 once for an artifact you can show your lawyer, your board, your investors.
02
We are not an automated AI Act compliance platform.
You don’t subscribe to a tool you’ll forget after month one (automated AI governance SaaS platforms such as Credo AI, Holistic AI, Modulos, Saidot, or Trail). You receive a document that exists and proves something, regardless of whether this platform is still online in 2 years.
03
We are not a runtime AI governance platform.
We are not a Sovereign AI Control Plane (Datadog, Kong, IBM watsonx.governance, ServiceNow, Collibra, Palo Alto + Portkey). We sit upstream of these platforms: we classify whether your AI system is high-risk before deployment; they instrument compliance after deployment. Complementary categories, not competitors. We are not affiliated with any AI vendor, regulator, or certification body. The score is not influenced by a conflict of interest. This is inscribed in our statutes, not in a privacy policy.
04
We do not produce legal opinions.
What you receive is not an interpretation. It’s a classification mapped directly to the law. When you need legal counsel, you arrive with a structured artifact, not a blank page.
05
We do not promise compliance.
We document your regulatory position at a given moment. Compliance is your responsibility. Our role is to give you a defensible starting point, not to sell you a certification we don’t have the power to deliver.
06
We are not your insurance.
If the information you provide is accurate, the report is. If it isn’t, the report reflects what you told us, not the reality of your system. Our independence is not a policy. It’s a condition of operation. We can only produce a defensible artifact if no one, including you, can influence the result.
A report produced now (within the 18-month runway before Annex III §1-7 high-risk obligations bind on 2 December 2027) is not just a compliance document. It is evidence of proactive regulatory positioning, demonstrating that your organization assessed its AI Act obligations before enforcement began. In any future regulatory investigation or procurement dispute, the date on your report matters.